Get a customized solution on this task at emuktask.com

Homework Help on emuktask.com, you can order your academic assignment from one of our 300+ project experts. Hire your expert directly, without overpaying for agencies and affiliates!
POST A QUESTION
   Computer Ethics but a narrower topic needs to be chosen which I don”t mind you doing. All of the requirements are written below with the template that needs to be filled in.
Instruction:InstructionsThis assignment gives the opportunity to explore a particular aspect of the subjects covered in this module.
Conduct a literature search within the existing body of knowledge relating to the chosen topic and identify 5 journal papers or conference proceeding papers relating to this topic. The choosing of the topic and the searching for papers will be an iterative process and will take some time to complete.All 5 papers should be on the same topic.Journal papers or conference proceeding papers must be from reputable academic publications and demonstrate academic rigor by, for example, containing references to other papers.A template is provided to complete this assessment.Each paper must be reviewed in 250 words. The focus should be on explaining the main messages of the paper and providing a critique of the paper. Higher marks will be awarded where students cross-refer between the five reviewsHarvard referencing must be used to identify the papers selected.URLs should NOT be included and if the paper chosen is not able to be referenced correctly without using a URL, a different paper should be selected.Use the Harvard guide to help you to correctly reference (available on blackboard). Advice is also available from the library, including through their ‘pop-up library’ at FOTAC, every Wednesday 12.00-1.00Google Scholar contains a wide range of full text papers (and more if you use a University-supplied computer than if you search at home, because University computers know what the library subscribes to). Also look at the information provided by the Library: http://libguides.library.dmu.ac.uk/c.php?g=51890&p=335386. You can get access to more papers using the facilities the Library provide than searching on Google Scholar.The Communications of the ACM is also a good journal to start with as it contains a wide range of papers covering all aspects of the module. It is readily available in the library and electronically. Also the IEEE publications are all available electronically through the DMU subscription provided by the library service. Both ACM and IEEE publish reputable conference proceedings.Important note:This coursework also includes a must pass viva/presentation that you may be required to attend. The aim of the viva/presentation is to give you the chance to demonstrate that the submitted work is your own and to give you the opportunity to defend the conclusions of that work. Failure to meet these aims in the viva may result in you failing the viva and the coursework overall.hi, the feedback sheet that i”ve attached is for official use only but i”m sending it to you so you know how each paper will be marked.Also, if you struggle to find a narrow enough topic i”ll ask the tutor to help me with one and get back to you.I”ve sent all files to your email. Please check there.Harvard referencing

CTEC1412

Computer Ethics

Assignment 1

Review of Five Papers

For the attention of

Sara Wilford

P Number: ______________________________

Checklist

ItemConfirm
All 5 papers Harvard referenced 
All 5 papers have word count (250 max per review) 

Paper 1

Full details of the paper using the Harvard referencing system

          (approx. 250 words)

Summary and critique of paper 1 (approx 190 words)                 Conclusion reached on reading this paper (approx 60 words) 

State word count (max 250 words):
Paper 2

Full details of the paper using the Harvard referencing system

          (approx. 250 words)

Summary and critique of paper 2 (approx 190 words)                 Conclusion reached on reading this paper (approx 60 words) 

State word count (max 250 words):

Paper 3

Full details of the paper using the Harvard referencing system

          (approx. 250 words)

Summary and critique of paper 3 (approx 190 words)                 Conclusion reached on reading this paper (approx 60 words) 

State word count (max 250 words):

Paper 4

Full details of the paper using the Harvard referencing system

          (approx. 250 words)

Summary and critique of paper 4 (approx 190 words)                 Conclusion reached on reading this paper (approx 60 words) 

State word count (max 250 words):

Paper 5

Full details of the paper using the Harvard referencing system
Summary and critique of paper 5 (approx 190 words)                 Conclusion reached on reading this paper (approx 60 words) 

State word count (max 250 words):

CTEC1412 – Assessment – Review of papers (23%)

Aspects of Computing, Ethics and Professional Practice: an academic paper review

Name                                                         P No.                                      

 
Quality and relevance of papers, reference[Journal papers must be from reputable academic publications and demonstrate academic rigour, Harvard referencing must be used, no URLs] #1 #2 #3 #4 #5    /50
Quality of paper reviews[Main messages of paper, agreements and disagreements and why paper is worthy of being chosen, papers cross-referenced etc 250 words max] #1 #2 #3 #4 #5    /50
Comments     /100

CTEC1412

Computer Ethics

Assignment 1

Review of Five Papers

For the attention of

Sara Wilford

P Number: ______________________________

Checklist

ItemConfirm
All 5 papers Harvard referenced 
All 5 papers have word count (250 max per review) 

Paper 1

Full details of the paper using the Harvard referencing system

          (approx. 250 words)

Summary and critique of paper 1 (approx 190 words)                 Conclusion reached on reading this paper (approx 60 words) 

State word count (max 250 words):
Paper 2

Full details of the paper using the Harvard referencing system

          (approx. 250 words)

Summary and critique of paper 2 (approx 190 words)                 Conclusion reached on reading this paper (approx 60 words) 

State word count (max 250 words):

Paper 3

Full details of the paper using the Harvard referencing system

          (approx. 250 words)

Summary and critique of paper 3 (approx 190 words)                 Conclusion reached on reading this paper (approx 60 words) 

State word count (max 250 words):

Paper 4

Full details of the paper using the Harvard referencing system

          (approx. 250 words)

Summary and critique of paper 4 (approx 190 words)                 Conclusion reached on reading this paper (approx 60 words) 

State word count (max 250 words):

Paper 5

Full details of the paper using the Harvard referencing system
Summary and critique of paper 5 (approx 190 words)                 Conclusion reached on reading this paper (approx 60 words) 

State word count (max 250 words):

Instructions

This assignment gives the opportunity to explore a particular aspect of the subjects covered in this module.

Conduct a literature search within the existing body of knowledge relating to the chosen topic and identify 5 journal papers or conference proceeding papers relating to this topic. The choosing of the topic and the searching for papers will be an iterative process and will take some time to complete.

All 5 papers should be on the same topic.

Journal papers or conference proceeding papers must be from reputable academic publications and demonstrate academic rigor by, for example, containing references to other papers.

A template is provided to complete this assessment.

Each paper must be reviewed in 250 words. The focus should be on explaining the main messages of the paper and providing a critique of the paper. Higher marks will be awarded where students cross-refer between the five reviews

Harvard referencing must be used to identify the papers selected.

URLs should NOT be included and if the paper chosen is not able to be referenced correctly without using a URL, a different paper should be selected.

Use the Harvard guide to help you to correctly reference (available on blackboard).  Advice is also available from the library, including through their ‘pop-up library’ at FOTAC, every Wednesday 12.00-1.00

Google Scholar contains a wide range of full text papers (and more if you use a University-supplied computer than if you search at home, because University computers know what the library subscribes to).  Also look at the information provided by the Library: http://libguides.library.dmu.ac.uk/c.php?g=51890&p=335386.  You can get access to more papers using the facilities the Library provide than searching on Google Scholar.

The Communications of the ACM is also a good journal to start with as it contains a wide range of papers covering all aspects of the module. It is readily available in the library and electronically. Also the IEEE publications are all available electronically through the DMU subscription provided by the library service. Both ACM and IEEE publish reputable conference proceedings.

Important note:

This coursework also includes a must pass viva/presentation that you may be required to attend. The aim of the viva/presentation is to give you the chance to demonstrate that the submitted work is your own and to give you the opportunity to defend the conclusions of that work. Failure to meet these aims in the viva may result in you failing the viva and the coursework overall


Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount

Use this discount code to get 10% Discount - "GET10"

Assignment Solutions