How National Identity and Culture defines our own Identity.According to Kraemer et al. (2000), identity refers to self-definition and bestows a sense of personhood or self that is often found in interaction. Identity is an incessantly growing process of negation and not rigid identity.
Introduction

The concept of identity is of comparatively modern origin. According to Cinpoes (2008), its equivalent national identity is, in fact, more recent and appears to date back to the 1950s when it substituted terms such as national soul, national genius and national character. According to Jensen (2003), the term identity refers to a person, and is analogically extended to include the collectivities that relate to people, such as nation-states. On the other hand, Kraemer et al. (2000) defines national identity as the total of all qualities, which are either real or imaginary, which in the minds of people distinguishes a country. In this regard, this paper discusses how national identity and culture define personal identity.

People posses countless qualities and attributes, and stand in various relationships with others. Jensen (2003) cites that some of these relationships are transient and contingent, while others are tenacious and central. The bottom line is that these relationships and attributes influence them in various ways. The mere fact that we belong to a certain group is a contingent fact of one’s life. Humanity, religion, gender, culture, moral commitments, moral and psychological dispositions, dominant passions, and values constitute people in that they either dump them at all or cannot dump them without becoming different from others. Because they constitute people, they become an inherent part of people. this therefore make it extremely difficult to define personal identity independently of the above things that constitute an individual.

According to Kraemer et al. (2000), identity refers to self-definition and bestows a sense of personhood or self that is often found in interaction. Identity is an incessantly growing process of negation and not rigid identity. Cinpoes (2008) also cites that identity is not a harmonious process because there remains the propensity in the fact that many people have various, fragmented and incomplete identities. According to Kraemer et al. (2000), the pursuit of national identity needs an emphasis on the characteristics of a description of a country that identify a heritage and institutions held in common.


 

smilesmile. .






The post How National Identity and Culture defines our own Identity.According to Kraemer et al. (2000), identity refers to self-definition and bestows a sense of personhood or self that is often found in interaction. Identity is an incessantly growing process of negation and not rigid identity. appeared first on My Nursing Paper.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount

Use this discount code to get 10% Discount – “GET10”

Assignment Solutions